Monday, April 8, 2013

Bleeding the Creed


I guess the red gushing blood and the exposed white bone constituted the assumption that Kevin Ware does indeed bleed Louisville colors.  Isn’t that the creed most of us pledge to our given universities?  At what cost would you actually be willing jeopardize your body to test the theory?  Kevin Ware’s injury yet again raises the question on whether student athletes should be paid.

As for now, athletes receive full or half tuition, board, required course related books, and a monthly stipend.

To students at premiere universities such as the University of Southern California, just one of those listed options would be well received and appreciated. However, in a study by researchers at Ithaca College and a national athletes’ advocacy group, athletes on full scholarship at Division I universities still end up paying approximately $3,000 every year.

At USC in particular, $3,000 is incomparable to the rough $50,000 of debt most students accrue.

The idea that even those on a “full ride” have to take out loans in order to avoid placing additional burdens on their family is absurd.  In the 2011-12 year the FBS full athletic scholarship failed to meet the entirety of attending school by a $3,285 average. This left a large portion of players on a “full” athletic scholarship living below the federal poverty line.

The National College Players Association (NCPA) and the Drexel University Sport Management Department produced a study called, “The $6 Billion Heist: Robbing College Athletes Under the Guise of Amateurism” where they determined what college football and basketball players would make in a fair market using public information on the value of their scholarships and the revenue generated by each athlete.

The study found that each player on the top ten revenue-generating teams would miss out on their hard earned $3.5 million over the course of a 4-year stay at a university.

Kevin Ware specifically is worth $1.6 million annually in a fair market.

Paying fair market value for players may in fact cause unforeseen problems as a result. Especially giving kids that large amount of money at such a young age. Yet, with this argument I see little difference between the ages 19 and 22. In fact, universities understand the type of money that some of their athletes will receive once drafted to the NBA and NFL, but do little for the players’ financial literacy and professional development.

Somewhere along the road to national championships, the term “Student-Athlete” gets convoluted.

Most players are encouraged to pursue majors that impose the least on their commitments to their sport. Disciplines such as business are replaced by communications, or sociology. Each of the two is valuable in its own right, however neither provide the information essential to wealth management.

The 30 for 30 Documentary, “Going for Broke” showed that on average, NFL players go bankrupt 3 years after their retirement from the league. These bankruptcies are typically the result of extravagant purchases and assisting family members who conveniently turn into leeches.

There are very few athletes that have not only raised their jerseys beyond the rafters, but they themselves have risen beyond the courts or playing fields as entrepreneurs. Magic Johnson is the most notable with his most recent business ventures.

This information has been widely discussed for years and has been raised in the same breath as the adequate financial payments for student athletes question, yet nothing has been done on a national scale by the universities that have all the resources necessary to make a substantial change. It’s almost as if they do not care.

The NCAA and universities are not responsible for hospital bills of their injured players. Why? Well, because they argued in court that the players are “student-athletes,” and not “employees” therefore freeing them of liability.

If Kevin Ware happened to be a senior, his dream of making it to the NBA by being showcased through a college medium would have taken just as severe of a break as his leg. On top of the searing pain Ware would have normally been left with a hefty hospital bill that would add that nice salty burn. 

The NCAA has an insurance policy of up to $90,000 for student-athletes, but only during championship situations and with the stipulation that the players must be completely disabled, which Kevin Ware was not. Luckily for Ware’s wallet Louisville paid for his medical expenses. But to call Louisville’s move to pay for the medical bill is hardly honorable, it should be protocol.

Why wouldn’t universities want to take care of the individuals who equally contribute to admission rates, alumni financial support, and billions of dollars of generated revenue?

When will we stop vilifying athletes for choosing to enjoy the fruits of their labor by accepting finances under the table and begin by reconstructing the academic curriculum for student athletes and creating a policies that take care of the players who clearly do anything necessary to win. Even if that means showing the audience what it means to bleed their university’s colors.

5 comments:

  1. During the tournament, I remember hearing the story of one of the stars from Kansas whose name escapes me at the moment. Coach Bill Self said several times in an interview how much fun the player was having in college and simply loving life. However, he was going to have to turn pro following his freshman year because his family was in a dire financial position and needed his support from an NBA salary. At one point, 10 of his family members were living in a cramped house. I ended up having a discussion with some friends about what a shame it was that the NCAA's rules of "amateurism" prevented this young man from enjoying his last three years of college, getting his degree, and graduating with his friends. In an ideal world, the school or a generous booster could lend the player the money to support his family over the next three years and he could continue playing at Kansas and soaking up the college experience.

    Unfortunately, there are so many examples of how this notion of amateurism and not allowing players to reap the monetary benefits is a rather unfair system. The NCAA and its member schools pull in billions of dollars on merchandise and programming rights, and the athletes don't see any of that money. I think the only real chance for the system to change is the O'Bannon class action lawsuit against the NCAA, and I'm curious to see how it turns out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You raise a very interesting point here. Huge schools like USC make millions upon millions showcasing their athletes on national television, selling their jerseys in student stores, and reaping the benefits of their performance on the grand stage. A large factor for many people going to a school is not just their academics, but also their athletics. Students want to attend a school with an attractive athletic program because it creates a fun college atmosphere. So they use these athletes to essentially bolster their school in every way, but don’t give the athletes any monetary reward for doing so. Scholarships are great but one of my best friends is on a full scholarship and he literally lives from stipend check to stipend check just to get by. He’s devoted his entire college experience to being an athlete. He took a kinesiology major because it was supposed to be easier to get through, which he now greatly regrets as a senior more interested in entrepreneurship and design. Because he is so consumed with practice, meetings, weight training, and occasional homework, he rarely has time to socialize with me or any of his other friends, and when he does he literally can’t afford to do anything because he is always so strapped for cash. It’s not that he is lazy and refuses to work, but actually doesn’t have the time for a job. Like every other athlete at a major university, his sport is his job, and the only one making money from his work is that same university.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I’ve always wondered what happens to the majority of student athletes who dedicate their college careers to the high demands of athletics yet are not necessarily good enough or healthy enough to go pro. In sports programs at division one schools most athletes dedicate the majority of their time to that sport rather than attaining a useful, meaningful education. When they graduate and are suddenly done with the sport that they have spent most of their life playing, what options are there for retired athletes with degrees in majors they might not be interested in and without experience in the work place?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I actually think student athletes get the larger piece of the pie. Academics is the centerpiece of all academic institutions. Don't get me wrong, I love sports. I often cannot wait for football season to start; I may flip if u dare change the tv channel while the Laker game is on. But I feel like some academic institutions like USC have become more sports centered than its necessary. As a result, some even consider us as a sports institution than one of the finest academic institutions in the country--and quite frankly in the world. Most student athletes are on scholarships, they register for classes before most of us do, and often times, they enjoy lots of other benefits other students do not have access to. That is a lot to be given the opportunity to play the game you love if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Like Environmental Examiner I also think what happens to the student athletes who dedicate their time in college to the rigorous physical demands of being involved in a sport but who do not make it to the pros. My stepdad, for example, used to play college football at Stanford. His position on the team lead to later manifestations, which he is currently experiencing now. His back problems have gotten so bad to the point where he is officially considered disabled. Unfortunately, he has had to push off surgery because he cannot afford to take the time off of work. I think it is unethical of college sports programs to not, at the very least, subsidize the medical costs associated with his physical disability.

    His story in addition to this post reminds me of something I learned from a former D1 college football player who is now involved with sports broadcasting. He informed us that, first and foremost, college sports programs are businesses. If an athlete is injured during the season, the program simply finds another qualified athlete. Their concern for the well-being of athletes is incredibly limited. If an athlete suffers from later manifestations, they are already out of the program's hair and are of no concern.

    ReplyDelete